Thursday, 19 April 2018

Crowdcube's Affresol raised over £2.5m and is now in liquidation



Affresol created a new building block out of recycled materials. Their problem seems to have been a lack of business skills to solidify their own foundations.

Back in 2013, Affresol used Crowdcube to raise £130k. Since then they have had repeated rounds off platform, taking them to a share capital of over £2.5m. Accounts(the latest ones were never filed) show consistent losses and in a recent email we have seen, their last attempt to persuade investors to help out again went unanswered. Investors had seen enough.

Their projections were rich but the concentration on their core client Network Rail has never produced what they said it would. Sales have never come close to any of their projections, whilst costs have. QED the money has gone.

The company received considerable funding from Welsh Government grants - one for £245k in 2015.

We predicted its demise long ago but have had to wait until now for the result. Whilst it's good to right, yet again, this is a business that we think should have worked. It was just very poorly managed.

We wrote about the company several times here

Sympathies go out to all those who lost money.

Wednesday, 18 April 2018

Are Crowdfunding investors leaving themselves wide open to abuse?



A recent example on Seedrs comes to mind. Society pitched and successfully raised a heap of cash on the Seedrs platform in January 2018. Now investors have been told they dont want the cash - they have sourced it from somewhere better.


How do you investors feel about this  - really?

On checking out Society we came across a far more serious example of potential abuse.  The company recently suspended its M&A clause on pre emption rights by voting on a special resolution. That's fine as it was only going to affect the founders. But what if this happens when they have a Seedrs nominee account holding hundreds of Seedrs investors. These investors form only a small part of the overall share capital in the company. So the majority ownership by the directors could do the same thing whenever it chose.

Roll that fact out across all of the Seedrs and Crowdcube investments and you wonder why people bother with legal agreements. We have already seen a few cases where investors have had their pre emption rights removed.

What can investors do to protect against this?

Crowdcube's Award Winning Flossonic crashes out despite awards.



In 2013 Flossonic won Crowdcube's Product of the Year. Along with a whole host of other winners who have departed this world. It also took £126k off Crowdcube punters, claiming SEIS and EIS.


Since then it has done nothing. Flossonic was supposed to be a special electric toothbrush. Well it either never existed or it couldnt be sold as revenues were next to zero for all years since 2013 and now the company has been struck off by CH.

In summary, the 100 plus investors would have been better investing in a new wooden spoon manufacturer.

In 2013, Crowdcube struck a very rich vein with the award winners they selected and PRinged everywhere -

UPDATE - since writing this a day ago , Affresol has fallen off and is now in liquidation.

Righteous                            - Founders now moved onto Cauli Rice after massive de listing
Front Up                              - Bust
JAM Vehicles                      - Very slow see KS comments
Kamm and Sons                  - Had to change name and still very slow sales.
Green and Pleasant             - Bust
Ovivo                                  - Bust
Pizza Rossa                         - Bust
East End Manufacturing     - Bust
Inspiral                                - Hanging on
Solarmass                            - Bust
Wild Trail                            - Bust
Quantock Brewery              - Bust
HAB                                    - Doing OK
Seek&Adore                       - Bust
Ineed                                   - Bust
Affresol                               - Hanging on
Lawbit                                 - Hanging on
E Car club                           - Sold to Eurocar for small 3X ROI on £100k invested.
Carbonlights                        - Hanging on.
Cell Guidance Systems       - Hanging on
Fantoo                                 - Little idea, coupled with Dell.
Asset Match                        - Hanging on
Red Advertising                  - Hanging on - have been back for 5 more rounds.
New Galexy                        - Hanging on
Flossonic                             - Bust
Zovolt                                  - Some crazy accounting!

Dont forget these are Crowdcube's award winners; not some dross off the street. Hanging on means just that - not good at all.

26 in total, one sale for small returns. 11 bust but with 13 others heading that way. One doing OK but not close to an exit. Would you invest in these now?

 Since 2014 Crowdcube have stopped PRinging their awards. You can see why.




Tuesday, 17 April 2018

Is this another smash and grab on Crowdcube?



Jewelstreet is back on Crowdcube. It last funded here in 2014 and promised sales of over £30m in 2016. Sadly it has only just managed around a hundredth of this. Maybe this time round they will get to have a better go.

There has been a complete refurbishment of the management suite, led by the main shareholder, Guernsey based businessman Paul Fraser. Mr Fraser is a very busy man so how much time he will spend on this company is questionable. In fact Jewelstreet doesnt even get a mention on his Linkedin page. (Well it may now).

I suppose this all depends if you believe what they say in the pitch. The hard evidence we have is that for 3 years it has been a complete flop. But that is the same with pretty well all of the Crowdcube businesses. Yet you still fund them.

In the first pitch, which smashed its £100k total and finished on £180k, the company told investors via an article in Insider Media, here, that a likely exit date was 2016.

We wrote about them before here

 Non omne quod nitet aurum est!



Monday, 16 April 2018

Vita Mojo had some spare shares



Vita Mojo raised £3.2m on Crowdcube. Now it has offered those shareholders a time sensitive share offer at the same price for £300k worth of their shares. 


Vita Mojo puts a whole new meaning into laptop food. Their software allows them and you to create your own food.

The idea is new and it will be a while before we know if it works. But having raised over £3m via Crowdcube, shareholders were surprised to find an email asking them to buy more shares - an allotment that the company says was time limited and in total came to an investment of £300k. The minimum investment was set at £7,500. That time has now passed. 

Quite why they would be time sensitive was not explained. One idea we had was that this could be a case of an investor/s pulling out after the campaign closed? 

We dont really know - do you? 

Friday, 13 April 2018

Bactest succumbs to the classic start up flaw. Cash flow.



Bactest funded twice through the Syndicate Room platform; around £1m in total. Now with the cash gone and sales unable to meet costs, the company has put itself into liquidation.


There are two kinds of failures with start ups. Genuine companies that do everything in their power to trade and make money and companies that take the money and never had a chance. Bactest is firmly in the former camp.

As the name suggests, the company developed and sold equipment for testing bacteria levels in water. 

Its products did sell and the company won several industry awards. Since funding, it had added to its portfolio. But therein lies the problem. Maybe more concentration and spending on driving sales of their original products and less on R&D and this story could have turned out differently. Either that or deeper pockets. But the investment line ran dry and that gave the company little choice.

It is too early to know the state of their accounts but there is sure to be value in their IP. 

This is one failure that it seems fair to put down to death by natural causes. Both the company and Syndicate Room are helping with investor enquiries.    

Have you met The Russians? Revolut and Telegram have.



We were asked to provide some good news by a reader. That's quite difficult if we want to give you the facts. However this is an interesting illustration of the problems all things Russian have today.


As Im sure you all know, Revolut is the baby of a Russian parent. Recent news, which we were told was good news, reveals that there is a possible funding round for Revolut being led by DST, founded by the Russian venture capitalist Yuri Milner . This, if it happens, would push Revolut almost overnight into the Unicorn Club. It would also give Crowdcube investors a theoretical return of 30X.  You see we can do good 'news'.

But 'stoy' we cry. A recent development with the Telegram Chat App has led to the Russian Government blocking access. Telegram claims 9m Russian users. Telegram is owned by a Russian, Paul Durov. It recently completed a £1.2bn ICO. The reasons given for this block is that the company failed to give the Russian authorities access to the data of its subscribers. This is a so called security measure. The company originated in St Petersburg but left and is now in Dubai.

So when you hear that the company you invested in, Revolut for example,  has Russian connections, you should maybe factor this into your investment decision. Crowdfunding investors in Revolut came from Crowdcube and then Seedrs.

Thursday, 12 April 2018

Yet another Crowdcube success fails



We agreed not to disclose the name of this company, as they are trying to complete a deal that will mean they dont have to liquidate. But it is a busted flush in terms of the business and its 200 plus Crowdcube shareholders.


The CEO of XX has promised to give us the details of how the company came to this situation, in a month or so. He said he would also reveal his feelings about Crowdcube. That should all make for interesting reading. It is at least some progress to see a CEO who has used Crowdcube, try to clear up the mess rather than phoenixing or just disappearing as most of them do.

This company had some substantial Government backing, something that may well have swayed Crowdcube investors. You know how it works - oh look such and such which has a board crammed full of experienced business leaders has backed this venture, so better come on board. Only 2 years later and bang - its all gone tits up. All the investment burnt.

Just in case you are wondering, the 'sale' in progress is more of a handover with next to zero return for anyone. 

We'll let you know.

Thanks to the tip off from anon.  


Wednesday, 11 April 2018

Where have Socapps and its app Browsa gone?


Crowdcube's detritus builds into ever larger piles, as yet another success looks like failure. 


UPDATE - We were contacted by Dorian Spackman. He claims that he was never part of Socapps but that his company CMI, was contracted by Socapps to develop the Browsa App. We dont know if this is correct but in the Crowdcube Pitch it states that Dorian Spackmann is The Technical Director of Socapps - this information would have been verified by the FCA regulated Crowdcube platform, under their FCA licence before being used to sell this company's equity to the public. So someone is misleading someone else.  

Socapps Ltd, with its app Browsa,  has been in CH limbo for two years, having failed to file accounts since 2015. The company's SM has had no activity on it for 3 years. It looks like a busted flush.

Or as we call them, a zombie - a business that someone keeps on preventing the system from closing down. Crowdcube have plenty of them currently on their books. Companies that raised funding, and then just evapourated into the ether. Zombies are right up there with failures in terms of numbers of successes Crowdcube had funded. 

The Browsa App now appears to be sold by Cornish Media Industries, a company with a large deficit on its most recent balance sheet. The main director of CMI, a Dorian Spackman, was also a main feature in Socapps' Crowdcube pitch and was a director of a now closed company called Browsa App Ltd. He isnt connected legally to Socapps. 

Now it turns out that the Stephen Rushworth, the man behind the Crowdcube Socapps campaign , is now the Conservative CC for St Issey and St Trudy -  a post he won in the local elections by a small margin from the LibDems last year. In his register of interests, he mentions Socapps, but it's misspelt; twice. A search under Socapes Ltd comes up blank at CH, which might be useful if you didnt wish people to see its filing history.

We tried to contact all the players in this but as usual we didnt get a response. Honest men dont hide.

All a little odd but that will not come as any help to Crowdcube investors who have yet again been sold a pup by the platform.     

Monday, 9 April 2018

Is this to be Crowdcube's next really big failure?


Sustainable Power raised £1.8m on Crowdcube back in 2014. Promises of money saving gas boilers seem to have evapourated - we cant find sales or the product anywhere. Losses have been impressive and the team of specialist engineers on the board have all gone. What seems to be left is a guy whose speciality is Isle of Man Companies and liquidations.

UPDATE - 

Following The Times article, we can now confirm all of our articulated suspicions about the is company are true. They lied about most of the claims they made on Crowdcube. Crowdcube did not bother to check these claims and indeed instead promoted them as verified by the platform. In what looks as close to scam as a scam can get,  the author of this mess has disappeared - presumably off shore. 

LESSONs - Crowdcube sucks. The FCA is pointless.

For all those thinking of Crowdfunding, the SP Crowdcube video is worth watching. It very cleverly engages its audience in the story of SP and how it will take over the world. Not much in the video has come to pass yet and we have some doubts that some of its content is genuine. However in the hands of a real company, this technique would work well.

We have written several pieces on SP - here - all of them bad.

Lets take a look at the man behind this enterprise first. Ashley Moore appears on his LI page dressed in white tie; his main job has been as a LIFFE trader. His page has little more information - just two companies listed. SP and City Golf Clubs Ltd. 

City Golf Clubs was put into liquidation last year. Its parent company is named as Seattle Investments LLC. CGG accounts show that Seattle Investments is registered in the Isle of Man. The Liquidator's report gives them a Geneva address. CGG went down owing considerable sums  - totalling almost £1m. Most of this was owed to Seattle Investments. 

That is a coincidence, because one of the main SHs in Sustainable Power, is an Isle of Man registered company called Tacoma Properties LLC, registered at 8 St Georges Street, Douglas IoM. This is the same address given for Seattle Investments. This address appears in the Panama Papers. Just saying.

One report we have from the IoM Government website states that both Tacoma and Seattle ceased to exist on the same date - 21 July 2017. We dont know for sure that Ashley Moore is the founder/director of either of these IoM companies - you have to pay for that information. But its an interesting coincidence.

As if things were not odd enough, a previous version of SP, Sustainable Power Solutions Ltd was finally liquidated in February 2015, having started the process well before the newco appeared on Crowdcube. Ashley Moore was the main man here too and almost all the money owed, was owed to that Tacoma outfit in the IoM. 

In the video we mentioned at the start, there are claims made. These are claims that Crowdcube would have been duty bound to check under the terms of their FCA licence. One is that SP already had a 2e boiler delivered and saving money for a Sunderland care home run by the Gentoo Group. We have not been able to verify this. SP claim to have BSI certification. We checked this with the BSI register but could not find any Sustainable Power Ltd. That claim was made as part of the Crowdcube campaign for £1.8m. That does not mean it doesnt have one, just that we couldnt find it. It seems unlikely that a care home would take on an experimental boiler that was not BSI certified as safe. SP's website has the BSI logo but this is easily downloaded for free.

In the Crowdcube verified pitch, SP stated the following -

B. ACHIEVEMENTS TO DATE
The Spice 2e unit has passed its British Standard Institution (BSI) Certification for the installation of demonstration units into its customer base and a live trial has been installed into a care home in Sunderland.
The unit was installed 3 months ago and we estimate that it is currently running over 23 hours a day and delivering over 4,000 litres of hot water on a daily basis to 35 rooms and 11 bungalows.
The Spice 2e can be installed quickly in under 2 hours by one of our service engineers and is delivered to site once the services (water gas, flue and hot water tank) have been fitted. As we are predominately installing in plant rooms all these services are already close to hand.
Sustainable Power has signed an MOU with ESP www.espprojects.com for 2,000 units as soon as they become available and indicated to a further 90,000 suitable sites in the North East alone. Three demonstration units are currently being installed in their client base one of which has already been running for several months.

"We have found that the unit has been capable of seamless integration into the existing building services... We are confident that this unit has significant potential in a wide range of applications and the inherent robustness of the design is a significant improvement on comparable units on the market." Don Lord, ESP Director

Separately, Sustainable Power have signed a further MOU for 1,500 units on the same terms for several sites under the stewardship of Nick Tubbs’ Redtree Housing (a sustainable housing developer) for the Sherwood Housing project (http://www.redtreellp.com/background.asp)

We are currently in discussions with various main stream M & E contractors and housing associations in order to replicate this agreement throughout the UK.
We wonder if Crowdcube ever saw any of these documents?

Ashley names Colin Howel as the new company chairman in the pitch  - and messages everyone during the pitch -

Dear Investors,
We have recently taken on a new chairman who has over 35 years’ experience in large scale production and asset management. Colin has come on board as an active Chairman and will be bringing not only his manufacturing knowledge to the fore but will also be allowing Sustainable Power utilise the key personnel from the companies he currently owns to add /there experience to the commercialisation process.
Colin is currently the chairman and major shareholder in the companies listed below.
• http://www.ricor.co.uk/
• http://www.presscomm.co.uk/
• http://tc3mobile.com/
• http://www.unicornam.com
If you have any questions at all or would like to meet up for a chat please get in touch via 07768 981 111.
Kind regards,
Ashley Moore, Founder and CEO of Sustainable Power

However in the pitch he has spelt the chairman's name  - Howel. Odd! Checking Colin Anthony Howell's CV here there is no mention of SP as a company that he has been involved with. That mobile number doesnt get answered! Oh and this Colin Howell is almost certainly not this one - https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/colin-howell-plans-for-life-after-prison-28574524.html

The telephone number on the SP website 01869 327133 is disconnected. It is also the telephone number for a local, now defunct, eatery. The website new's page hasnt been updated in several years. There is no where on the website to purchase their product or even ascertain a price for it. Delivery and installation details are 'on hold'. Emails to the company have not been answered.

When it quacks like a duck and swims like a duck, then it is probably a duck. Of course the beauty of the IoM emblem is that no matter how you throw it, it always lands on its feet. Time will tell but the signs for Sustainable Power and £1.8m of Crowdcube investors' cash are not good.

Supposed to deliver huge savings, we just wonder if this 'business' was ever likely to deliver anything? 

Crowdcube in the Dock as they pull Smart Grid Ltd campaign after complaints about director's involvement in a previous Ponzi scheme



This is bad. Crowdcube has an FCA licence based on its ability to present investors with a fair level of information. Quite simply we now know for sure that they dont.



Just a few days ago a new pitch appeared on Crowdcube. The company is called Smart Grid Ltd. Ignoring the fact that this business has its own fundamental problems and is laughingly valued at £25m, one of its team of directors was cleared in 2010 in two court cases costing an estimated £20m, of being involved in a massive Ponzi scheme. The main man behind the scheme pleaded guilty. There is an article here in the Telegraph.

The companies involved in this scheme have a complex web of connecting lines but for our purposes it is sufficient to say that our director, Lincoln Fraser, was a director for the year before the companies went into administration owing many tens of millions.

This information is clearly material to any investors' decision on this opportunity.  However Crowdcude fail to mention it.

So if they do do checks on Directors, why didnt they find this? Or if they dont do checks, why lie? Or if they did checks and decided to bury this information, why have they got a FCA licence?

It is not a crime for Lincoln Fraser to try to forget what happened in 2010. But it should be one for Crowdcube not to have the very basic ability to pick this information up. As you will all know, we have been saying this since day one. Luke Lang sat in the HoC Treasury Committee meeting and stated that CC do thorough checks. Well now we know that is a lie.

This campaign is now suspended although you can still view it by doing a simple google search. The morons!

Smart Grid isnt. The company hasnt traded as of May 2017, since it was set up in 2014 according to CH. Now it makes claims in the Crowdcube campaign that -

We generate 1.65MW of green energy (CHP & OFGEM approved) from our own power station facilities which is sold to the power station building owner, G4 Group, and also (indirectly) to the National Grid, who pay for every kilowatt saved.

Some of the comments on the forum suggest Crowdcube really have been caught with their trousers round their ankles this time -


INSANE Valuation and Directors involved in Fraud
TAllen 18 hours ago
4 Replies
GBP25m pre-money valuation for a Company with £100 in the bank as of Mar (dormant according to filings), no clear operations as we stand today and no patents.
Crowdcube really is letting anything go nowadays.
22%
25 days left
lizmcp 17 hours ago 
I've invested the minimum £10 just to be privvy to follow-up/investigation information. I assume the fund page will disappear soon.
LgMg 13 hours ago 
Dear TAllen,
Thank you for sharing this information. You are right, that Crowdcube is lacking on due diligence. Cheers,
Lg Mg
KHussain 12 hours ago 
Just read this. This is a bit shocking to let a company on their website.
Crowdcube please read the article provided.
Thanks for posting it
HFLondon 1 hour ago 


Investors really need to march with their feet and end this nonsense.

Friday, 6 April 2018

Rib Club Global illustrate Crowdcube's GAP mentality


Rib Club Global is yet another Crowdcube funded company who have created a large gap between what they promise and what they deliver.


Crowdcube pitch projections in 2014 showed profits of over £200k, when they took £147k off investors. These have vanished into losses for the recent very late filed accounts. They have filed losses of £2k. 

Activity looks very weak - trade creditors zero and trade debtors £1k. You might hope that decreasing losses were a sign of increased business and chances of some good growth in 18 and 19. Well the accounts dont generally lie and to have no trade creditors is either fantastic management or a sign of little activity. The main activity for the year seems to have been work done for and invoiced to a 100% owned loss making subsiduary, registered in Spain. Hmmm.  

Who knows. Until we start to demand more information from Limited Liability Co's, its just a guessing game. Its like the guys in the picture, are they building or removing the bridge? Only Frits knows. 


Thursday, 5 April 2018

Jon Allen - Crowdcube Entrepreneur of the Year 2012.



This is the shocking state of our entrepreneurial base in this country. A serial failure in the world of start ups is now charging people to advise them on start ups. All using the fact that he was Crowdcube Entrepreneur of the Year 2012.


This sort of thing does my head in. It certainly does not help UK plc.

Jon Paul started a business in 2005 called Front Up Ltd. He traded rugby shirts. That was all fine. In 2012 the business got into a spot of bother and he put it into administration. Well that is fine too, anyone who has run businesses will have had a failure.

In 2012 as Front Up was telling creditors that they had lost their money, Jon Allen was setting up Front Up Retail with Keith Watson - who has featured recently in the Suit that Fits saga. Together they formed Front Up Retail Ltd - using the heavily discounted assets that JP had bought from his administration. 

That's not quite so good.

This Front Up Retail has featured here many times - it raised money on Crowdcube twice in 2012 and then again in 2013 before collapsing in a total mess and being sold on in another pre pack to Lyle and Scott. Investors and creditors lost it all.

That's getting worse.

Now in 2016, JP set up another company - Enploy Ltd. This company uses the expertise of JP to advise start ups - for which it charges - who are these idiots? JP's bio on the company website tells interested parties that he has  - 

over 15yrs experience creating, growing and selling disruptive concepts into new markets. Crowdcube Entrepreneur of the Year 2012.

I think you can guess what we think about that. JP hasnt a clue what he is talking about when it comes to running a company. Just look at the evidence.

In much the same way of as Julia Elliot Brown has created a myth for herself after her business, Upper St, lost Seedrs investors all their money and left her creditors (£400k plus) to die, so JP is trying to create a myth around his failed entrepreneurial history. It simply is not honest and it really shouldnt be allowed. Failure is fine but you have to own it. This country needs better learning about business and how to make it work; not how to avoid the consequences of failure. 

Ecco Recordings attempts to close itself down.



You remember we keep going on about Zombie companies that Crowdcube has helped fund. Well this one Ecco Recordings, backed by Pels Asset Management, is about to close - at last. 


It wasnt a big one for Crowdcube, £140k invested in 2013/4. Still it follows a very similar pattern to most of Crowdcube's successes. Massive promises followed by no delivery followed by a few years in the wilderness followed by collapse. 

We wrote about them in March 2017 here and despite an anon posting a lengthy comment about how wrong we were, everything we said has turned out to be true. Crowdcube investors shafted and lied to. Company run so poorly it has collapsed even with the money that the Pels family office have. One assumes, as Philip Pels has signed off on the application to close the venture, that at least no creditors will be hung out to dry.

It all brings back memories of T. Rex's 71 classic  - Rip Off. 

Wednesday, 4 April 2018

The Crowdcube story is a classic example of how not to grow your start up.




Crowdcube were the first but they have failed to capitalise on their first mover advantage. As yet another Crowdcube success fails, what is their next roll of the dice? 


You have to give Darren and Luke, the founders of Crowdcube, a certain amount of credit for having the idea and getting it going. But that's where the credit must end.

PR can only paper over so many cracks before the walls cave in. Crowdcube is mainly PR - lift the hood and you find a cheap two stroke engine where the PR says its a gleaming V8. Proving the model worked was always going to be difficult. To work, we had to see exits and these take time - much longer than the fantasy figures provided in Crowdcube pitches. You dont expand your cost base unless you have evidence the model works - not if you want to succeed. They either couldn't wait or more likely didnt know this. So they led with PR and fell back on PR - it's all been a myth building exercise. 

To illustrate, here is an article from 2017 in The Telegraph by James Titcomb - it opens....









Members of the public have invested more than £250m via Crowdcube, the crowdfunding website has announced.
The milestone comes after a number of businesses funded through the site have been sold, leading early investors to pocket huge gains.


Firstly the public have not invested more than £250m and they know it. Secondly you would have to look very hard for one of these lucky recipients of huge gains and even then, you would fail. It's simply PR put out by the boys and naively reprinted by a lazy journalist. Of course it does depend on your definition of 'huge'; a ploy CC use a lot. Ask CC's loyal investors and they would just cringe.

The main problem is that neither Darren or Luke have run anything successful - ever. They do not have that knowledge, despite what Darren claims in his CV. They have made mistake after mistake with Crowdcube, to the point where now, 7 years after they started, real progress has hit the buffers.

You cant blame them for trying but the really stupid part is repeating the same thing over and over again and hoping it will bring you different results.  

The initial reaction to their launch and the first businesses was WOW - first adopters were enthusiastic. The business was small but grew rapidly - failures were slow to come through and they managed a couple of decent (not WOW) exits with Camden and ECar Club. They managed the situation very well - big news about the exits and very little information about the failures. 

By 2015/16 however, there were no more exits and the failures began to mount up. People started asking if the hype around the pitches was just that. Darren and Luke introduced some new toys - mini bonds for example. This allowed them in future years to promote a return on investment figure - even though these were loans not investments in the equity sense - ie 'returns' were just the interest paid out on the bond. They didnt bother to distinguish as this would rather spoil the story.

These bonds came and went and we are now left with one company failure  - Square Pie - where all bond holders lost their cash. Plenty of other companies that have used the Crowdcube bond have been struggling - The Eden Project, River Cottage, Chilango and Taylor St Baristas to name 4. 

By 2016 Crowdcube as a company was accumulating very large losses, running at between £4m and £5m pa. It had in its own CC raises, created some ludicrous projections. In fact our records show that the Crowdcube projection to reality ratio or the PR ratio (!), is one of the worst for 500 companies we have records for. That says a lot.

Investors at this stage were still buoyant - still believing the PR issued that 'next year will be a very exciting one for Crowdcube'. You can take any year, the PR message is the same. Jam tomorrow.






By 2016/17 Crowdcube was burning through over £8m a year. They put their commission rate up from 4% to 7.5%  but they were no way near to raising the required £100m plus per annum to get to break even. Despite the PR, their accounts will show more massive losses for 2017. Their backers are deep pocketed but there will come a time when they stop filling in ever larger holes. 

And here's the rub. They are now running out of time. With no exits to talk about and investors becoming far more vary of the sorts of manipulation they have been guilty off, the funding for businesses is not growing at the required rate. We dont think they will ever get to BE. How many times can Luke say that next year is the one? We have a queue of failing companies on our radar - all funded via Crowdcube. Yes there are some we would expect to make a good exit but by the time investors have been diluted 6 times and had their 'rights' rewritten, what return they will is questionable

Their latest ploy is a good one - partnerships with various related companies outside of London. So for example a partnership with Scottish solicitors Harper Macleod is expected to pick up Scottish business. According to their own PR, this will double their deal flow. Well it may increase the number of attempted pitches, but will it really increase the investment stream - they only make money on completed deals? We doubt it - it has come too late. Harper Macleod may not have done much research into Crowdcube. They fell for the PR. Their clients wont be pleased.  Investors we speak to have moved on to other platforms, ones that take a much more professional and holistic approach. This is the way forward. Crowdcube fund you and ditch you - investors have to look after themselves; the platform takes zero responsibility for the information it publishes. Which is fortunate, as they might have been sued otherwise. But that model simply doesnt work. Investors tell us this and the number of failures and zombies funded via Crowdcube endorses it.

The only answer for Crowdcube is to get at least one large exit - a X10 job. And it has to be in 2018. They have lost their first mover advantage and in the hands of Darren and Luke it turned out to be a disadvantage. Funding hopeless companies using fantasy projections is never going to create a sustainable business - for anyone. Even with S/EIS. 

There are one or two possible exits. One has a targeted IPO for this year but Crowdcube were only involved in a very small way - Seedsr will get this credit. Others have 'exited' early, much the same as Camden, forcing CC SHs to sell up and greatly reducing their returns. Many have gone bust or are doing nothing. The return is very poor. You cant hide that forever, even by mixing in bondholders percentages. 

Having bigged themselves up so much for 7 years, it looks likely that Darren and Luke will be hoist on their own petards. When people told them that their model wouldnt work, they would have done well to listen.   

DW Clothing collapse throws up some interesting patterns.



This story is long and painful. It involves Crowdcube, Envestors, various defunct companies, Nepal, an accountant and some very dodgy numbers. It is rotten to the core. Are you sitting comfortably? Then.........


First things first - we wrote about this crew twice here, warning people. So investors have no excuses.

We start in 2006 in Nepal. David Kishan Hathiramani had an idea to make suits for Londoners using tailors in Kathmandu. He set up ASTF Ltd. They traded quite well for 2/3 years and began looking at taking on pop up fittings centres. The crash in 2008 was where it all started to go wrong.

Skipping on, according to the liquidators for ASTF Ltd, they had failed to pay HMRC over a lengthy period of time and by 2012 owed them large sums of money for Corporation Tax, PAYE and VAT. A monthly payment scheme was agreed but ASTF failed to adhere to it. In 2012 the company filed large losses. In some mad attempt to rid himself of these debts, David declared that the accounts for 2011/12 were be re presented. The company told HMRC that this would remove £29k off their bill. Well quite obviously HMRC saw that one coming and proceeded against the company for full recovery. Then RBS stepped in.

To cut a long story short, ASTF went bust owing HMRC and RBS large sums but also owing large sums to creditors. It was a mess. 

Round about 2012 ASTF used the services of an accountant, Keith Watson. Now it turns out that Watson was in the market for a failed company and was the only offer the administration for ASTF received. He paid a few thousand pounds for the business. Keith we will meet again. 

So when you read in the Crowdcube 2015 pitch that David and his team had almost bravely saved the business by restructuring it in 2012, you know you are dealing with some degree of bullshit. ASTF was appallingly badly managed. Full stop. It then tried to hoodwink HMRC in plain sight. End of. It wasnt restructured so much as pre packed by pouring all the broken bits into a bin liner and handing them to Keith Watson's newly incorporated DW Clothing. 

So back to 2015 and Crowdcube. Keith Watson - the new owner of DW Clothing which now owned ASTF's assets decides to Crowdfund. They select Crowdcube. 

Was there a reason for choosing equity crowdfunding and Crowdcube?

We think so. Easy money. Now for a short detour............

If you delve into the world of Keith John Watson there are clues.

Most of you will remember the failed Front Up and Front Up Retail. The latter funded three times on Crowdcube in 2012/13 taking £227k off punters before crashing out. Well Keith Watson was a director and SH of both companies. We wrote a lot about this outfit, we felt they were being less than honest with investors and that Crowdcube had failed to warn people. Does that ring any bells? Between them, they went down owing creditors in excess of £500k - all facilitated by Crowdcube. And whats more in a pre pack deal (yes another one) to Lyle and Scott, the founder of Front Up got himself a well paid job with Lyle and Scott which included his business loan being paid off.

Ok, so you might say this is just a coincidence and for just this one case, we might agree. However more recently, Keith Watson has reappeared on Crowdcube - this is for the third time. He is listed by Discovery Yachts Group as a director. DYG raised £2.2m on Crowdcube in January 2018, just a few months after Keith had joined them. DYG are still in business. However, you have to ask  - if investors had known about Watson's involvement in Front Up, ASTF and the now refunct DW Clothing, would they have been as keen to invest? Would they also have viewed his numbers, he is their FD, with more caution? They were not told - this is the description given for Watson on the Crowdcube pitch -

 KEITH WATSON - FINANCE DIRECTOR (58)
Keith is a highly experienced FCCA with extensive experience of fast growth businesses. He has worked primarily in the luxury retail market, at brands including Joseph and Aspinal of London. He has enabled a number of acquisitions and successful exits.

Keith John Watson gives his birth date at CH as May 1959. Well that is until you come across an entry for a Kieth John Watson with a birth date November 1959. This Keith John Watson gives the same address and its the same address that Keith Watson used to sign off the Front Up liquidation papers. We have said for a long time that CH needs to issue company directors with one unique registration number so that this 'confusion' is avoided. Of course knowingly giving false information as a company director is an offence. To all of us.

Looking at the numbers for DW Clothing and DSKG, we find some patterns. 

In the Crowdcube pitch in 2015, the historic financials given do not tally with the numbers given at CH nor do they tally with the numbers given in the 2016 Envestors ECF pitch, which raised another £426k for the company. So either the company filed false accounts or they gave fake figures to one or both of Crowdcube or Envestors. The differences are material. We know that Crowdcube dont check anything but we didnt know that Envestors operate a self check system. Which if you think about it, is a little pointless. The Envestors raise was after the management at DSKG had pivoted the company and attempted to go for a franchise model. We dont think Envestors did their clients any favours putting this business their way!

So, as the Times reported today here, DW Clothing has been binned and a newco Tailored Franchises Ltd, set up by the same people, has taken over. According to the Times there was no comment from the Administrator. Well Im not surprised  - he seems to be struggling to get at the truth. The fact that really matters here is that DW Clothing owned the brand and the logo for A Suit that Fits - trade mark EU011657781. This TM was registered in 2013 at Keith Watson's given address. According to the UK TM office, it is still owned by DW Clothing. So the Administrator can sell it. Whats more, all of the SM that Tailored Franchises is now using to sell suits, is still owned by DW Clothing. We know this because their pages were started in 2006 when ASTF was the name of the company. DW Clothing bought all of the assets of ASTF, so they own the SM and all its mailing list etc. That should be a valuable asset?

If this was an attempt to crook the system, then they have not done it very well. If the Administrator would get off his fat arse and do some work, he could attempt to sell all of these stolen assets - to the people behind Tailored Franchise Ltd. That would at least be the correct way to do things.

Meanwhile Crowdcube and Envestor investors, who own shares in DSKG Bespoke - the holding co which owned 100% of DW Clothing, are in limbo. Their only source of revenue in this business, DW Clothing, is being liquidated and somehow the directors have hived off the only things of any value into Tailored Franchises - even though they are not allowed to do this.

It should be noted that   -

  • In the Envestors PD for DW Clothing, they didnt use the registered TM for A Suit That Fits. We dont know why.
  • Tailored Franchises was incorporated in October 2017
  • The current A Suit that Fits web site is copyright to 'A Suit that Fits' 2013. This has no legal meaning. There has never been a legal entity with that name. The site is still owned by DW Clothing, even if the Administrator doesnt know that. In the T&C Tailored Franchising is shown to be running the site. Purchasing from this site is not advisable.
This collapse bears worrying resemblances to another Crowdcube fiasco - Ethos Global. With Ethos, the original appointed Cambridge Administrator couldnt cope with the depth of deceit that the old founders had perpetrated, so had to hand on to another one. So far nothing has been filed and the old founders are using the old company assets, which they do not own, to build a new business in London. Again all only possible thanks to Crowdcube. 


Well we did warn you.

Have a coffee - you've earned it.

An after thought -

When The Times contacted DSKG Bespoke about this story, they were by DSKG, that the nwsco was owned by DSKG. This was simply wrong. Later they changed this story to -  they would issue new shares to all CC SHs in DSKG. We have yet to see this happen. If, before this story broke, the directors of DSKG and DW Clohting had had any intention of 'looking after' their SHs (without The Times holding their feet to the fire), they would have made DSKG the sole owner of Tailored Franchises Ltd from incorporation, as they had with DW Clothing. They didnt do this. QED they are a bunch of crooks. Time for the FCA to actually do something. Crowdcube need to have their wings clipped. Enough is enough. Crooks can only get away with what the platforms allow them to chance.